From: "Mark M." <markm@voicenet.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 16:42:39 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: anonymity and e-cash
In-Reply-To: <m2zpx9lfrz.fsf@clouds.heaven.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970212194144.3162A-100000@purple.voicenet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On 12 Feb 1997 janke@unixg.ubc.ca wrote:

> It's not too hard: The payee forwards a blinded, non-signed coin
> to the payer. The payer has the bank sign this, and then returns
> it to the payee who strips out the blinding factor.

This is correct except for the fact that the payer also has to apply a blinding
factor to the coin, thus making it a "double-blinded" coin.  It gets signed by
the bank, the payer divides the coin by the blinding factor and sends it to
the payee, who then strips out his blinding factor.  Ecash coins can also be
laundered making the above scheme mostly unnecessary.  Since most people will
probably not look upon fully anonymous ecash highly, laundering will be a more
popular option as it cannot be prevented.


Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBMwJkjyzIPc7jvyFpAQFHcwgAm2TZXg3wVDCtXyHBdq7WX44iA+nIvmHJ
GlcXCjyKBEmvRPfkvU/NUnS1cRfjsPh5ZmjNwjBc21lwxjcOLFtu+3Mcd6tNoyYQ
4Abp4lvJLnpGAtAVeSeTAw+7mzwrC0jfWgt2meNbnyp2WxLxg/JA7VGGkS39g4Jm
+i3F8H00mFJfmZUGpAiywE7GNobCXeppPJOn/QHA4/FrWJx5hE39qgB7U+AFwYVP
PHGy4SSSBeKWciK83DU3Bz6ptygznL7fHW4vOZ8UM5QZjbyiDomVriSuJHw0lKdH
r63BhOqYPXgMHgsa28XTlI9AWN5PpaIbvORTHOWv40EF3nGVrWGnMw==
=Vpit
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----