From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
To: John Young <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: aaca549057425bec15832e8e8e910af65f9cb8d2b2fc785a6271a19021a56b23
Message ID: <3.0.32.19970211162704.006cebec@192.100.81.136>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-12 00:27:25 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 16:27:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 16:27:25 -0800 (PST)
To: John Young <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: STE_pup
Message-ID: <3.0.32.19970211162704.006cebec@192.100.81.136>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 11:39 AM 2/11/97 -0500, John Young wrote:
> Oracle's new fingerprint checking device to assure bona fide
> log-on privileges. Covers other such devices, quotes a maker:
> "if criminals or hackers get through these, industry will
> step up one more level."
Fingerprint readers tend to work regardless if the finger is attached to a
body or not. All that fingerprint readers will do is increase the damage to
those relying on ever increasing, but misguided, methods of authentication.
See the rise in "identity theft" since SSN's began to be used for
identification.
-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred
"I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and
violence, I would advise violence." Mahatma Gandhi
Return to February 1997
Return to “Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>”
1997-02-12 (Tue, 11 Feb 1997 16:27:25 -0800 (PST)) - Re: STE_pup - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>