1997-02-07 - Re: Deloitte-Touche?
Header Data
From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
To: mark@infolawalert.com
Message Hash: afeae56a9c412bd0f00e7e8ce9a69d846ffddf058d8e2262eb5924ffb4a7b33a
Message ID: <199702071115.LAA00460@server.test.net>
Reply To: <199702052256.OAA06322@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-07 11:21:24 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 03:21:24 -0800 (PST)
Raw message
From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 03:21:24 -0800 (PST)
To: mark@infolawalert.com
Subject: Re: Deloitte-Touche?
In-Reply-To: <199702052256.OAA06322@toad.com>
Message-ID: <199702071115.LAA00460@server.test.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mark <mark@infolawalert.com> writes:
> I'm almost certain that Murray is a consultant rather than
> or in addition to an accountant. He's been saying these things
> for years at conferences, in papers, on mailing lists, etc.
To get the definitive version I asked him what his relationship to DT
is (I got his email address from a sci.crypt posting), and this is
what he said:
: I am a consultant to Deloitte & Touche's information security
: practice.
So now we know.
Nice that he defended freedom to use cryptography anyway,
Adam
--
print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<>
)]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`
Thread
Return to February 1997
- Return to “Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>”
- Return to “Mark Voorhees <mark@infolawalert.com>”
Return to “Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>”
- 1997-02-05 (Wed, 5 Feb 1997 14:56:42 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Deloitte-Touche? - Mark Voorhees <mark@infolawalert.com>
- 1997-02-06 (Wed, 5 Feb 1997 18:11:16 -0800 (PST)) - Deloitte-Touche, e$pam plug, Moderation, Cypherpunks as a cresotebush - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
- 1997-02-06 (Thu, 6 Feb 1997 12:05:23 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Deloitte-Touche? - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
- 1997-02-07 (Fri, 7 Feb 1997 03:21:24 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Deloitte-Touche? - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>