1997-02-21 - IDEA/Strength?

Header Data

From: camcc@abraxis.com (Alec)
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>
Message Hash: b138ce60f67e72b2ed82a170adf5b1289c855917578b52e4af3f73a6aa521193
Message ID: <3.0.1.32.19970221162111.006a8310@smtp1.abraxis.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-21 21:21:23 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 13:21:23 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: camcc@abraxis.com (Alec)
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 13:21:23 -0800 (PST)
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>
Subject: IDEA/Strength?
Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19970221162111.006a8310@smtp1.abraxis.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Is the strength, or lack thereof, of conventional PGP encryption
proportional
to the length of the conventional password?

For example, when I encrypt conventionally, does it make any difference
internally (disregarding the ability to guess the password) if I choose
to
use the pass phrase heyyou, or
[Harris$Pizza*Axis/LilburnKfreakmaisUoui@(.
Not so much the randomness of my password as the length?

 Do more characters give the encryption process more to work with?

Thanks.

Alec
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 4.5
Comment: Public key available on request or from keyservers.

iQCVAgUBMw4RtCKJGkNBIH7lAQEDmwP/WANzYA3KVyL5yNyE02hYotMgR6EKPxIm
Q4hP5TiZzAve29CMc972Udeb1BJU9Ow6slHbpoLREH1qlWWqNpzO3YS6X5nYrXDM
NeEf4sCTxkZ/33u48rv4T0ZD69/JGQV11/GMbsI3wJjCKW57Fb8cE8ANj4dDWblm
6spqX6YDecQ=
=/AVU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread