From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 07:25:44 -0800 (PST)
To: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Subject: Re: PCS Encryption?
Message-ID: <199702031525.HAA26007@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


John Young wrote:
|    http://www.nsa.gov:8080/programs/missi/condor.html

# How secure is CONDOR?
# 
#      Current proof-of-concept hardware is FORTEZZA(TM) based
#	(sensitive but unclassified)  Product versions will use STU
# 	for cellular voice and FORTEZZA(TM) Plus for net broadcast
# 	mode and data  

	I was under the impression that Fortezza was ok for classified
traffic.  Did I miss the changeover, was it unannounced, or was I
simply misremembering?

Adam

-- 
Pet peeve of the day: Security companies whose protocols dare not
speak their name, because they don't have one. Guilty company of the
day is now V-One.