1997-02-09 - Re: Is Sandy really censoring criticisms of Stronghold, his product?

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b23126878c0e242c87016bd32378a1a51e3aa86f1c669ef513a1289662856ab9
Message ID: <o0DV2D1w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <Pine.OS2.3.95.970209123447.1348A-100000@klinzhai.nanticoke.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-09 19:10:11 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 11:10:11 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 11:10:11 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Is Sandy really censoring criticisms of Stronghold, his product?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OS2.3.95.970209123447.1348A-100000@klinzhai.nanticoke.net>
Message-ID: <o0DV2D1w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Michael Gurski <mgursk1@umbc.edu> writes:
>
> On Fri, 7 Feb 1997, William H. Geiger III wrote:
>
> > I do find the accusation that Sandy blocked the posting of a message critiz
> > the company he works for rather troubling. Though there are several
> > possibilities:
> >
> > 1 - It is just more FUD.
> >
> > 2 - Snafu. As I am sure everyone here is aware of that this happend more of
> >     than not with computer system.
> >
> > 3 - It's true. This would be realy sad and probably do irreparable harm to
> >     Sandy's reputation.
> >
> > I hope that it is #1 or #2 if it is #3 I doubt that I will stay any longer
> > the cypherpunks list. :(
>
> Count it as #3...  Sandy didn't pass my response to one of Vulis'
> messages (asking for him to supply some evidence) to either list, and
> e-mailed me, telling me about it.

Please post Sandfart's e-mail to this mailing list.  Thank you.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps





Thread