1997-02-05 - Re: Cypherpunks FOIA request

Header Data

From: Peter Hendrickson <pdh@best.com>
To: Greg Broiles <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b952a1faae4005b9a538a6b5766269cf4c391fa5dafcc33d147a492a59b8f2e1
Message ID: <199702051701.JAA00977@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-05 17:01:36 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 09:01:36 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Peter Hendrickson <pdh@best.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 09:01:36 -0800 (PST)
To: Greg Broiles <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Cypherpunks FOIA request
Message-ID: <199702051701.JAA00977@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 12:40 AM 2/5/1997, Greg Broiles wrote:
> On 1/18/97, I sent freedom of information act requests to the FBI (main and
> San Francisco offices), CIA, NSA, and Secret Service, asking them for copies
> of information in their files relating to or referring to the cypherpunks
> list, the cypherpunks meetings, and copies of any messages sent from or to
> "cypherpunks@toad.com".

> To date, I have received three responses: one from the SF office of the FBI,
> indicating that they have no records responsive to my request; one from the
> NSA, indicating that they are processing my request, and one from the Secret
> Service, asking for a copy of my signature. (I've got no clue why they want
> that; unless I screwed up, I believe my initial request was signed.)

Have these organizations been known to lie?  What penalties does
the organization or its employees face when they do so?  Have these
penalties ever been applied?

Also, which exceptions in the FOIA law would allow them to respond
dishonestly?

Inquiring minds want to know!

Peter Hendrickson
pdh@best.com








Thread