1997-02-02 - Re: Cyphernomicon by Tim May

Header Data

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
To: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Message Hash: ca6e407897cae765d9def7b92a0d16c594b4cff8269079e187deb27e42e45921
Message ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970202000753.8579C-100000@cp.pathfinder.com>
Reply To: <199702020325.TAA06428@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-02 05:10:17 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 1 Feb 1997 21:10:17 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 1997 21:10:17 -0800 (PST)
To: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Subject: Re: Cyphernomicon by Tim May
In-Reply-To: <199702020325.TAA06428@toad.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970202000753.8579C-100000@cp.pathfinder.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


That question is one for Tim to answer, but I should point out that
philosophical anarchists are not necessarily opposed to rules, just
government rules -- which this moderation policy clearly is not.

-Declan


On Sat, 1 Feb 1997, Dale Thorn wrote:

> Toto wrote:
> > 3.5.1 Contrary to what people sometimes claim, there is no ruling
> >        clique of Cypherpunks. Anybody is free to do nearly anything,
> >        just not free to commit others to course of action, or claim
> >        to speak for the "Cypherpunks" as a group (and this last
> >        point is unenforceable except through reputation and social
> >        repercussions).
> > 3.6.3 "Why isn't the list moderated?"
> >       ...hardly consistent with many of our anarchist leanings, is it?
> >       - "No, please, let's not become a 'moderated' newsgroup. This
> >       would be the end of freedom!
> 
> Is this why T.C. May hasn't posted in quite a while?
> 
> 
> 






Thread