From: Elliot Lee <sopwith@cuc.edu>
To: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Message Hash: d1d85ffc332f45183483803704ec6c16ade6a280d5d157a8f58c3103e0679934
Message ID: <199702210311.TAA28160@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-21 03:11:03 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 19:11:03 -0800 (PST)
From: Elliot Lee <sopwith@cuc.edu>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 19:11:03 -0800 (PST)
To: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: DES search publicity (was Re: Cryptanalysis)
Message-ID: <199702210311.TAA28160@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Wed, 19 Feb 1997, Adam Back wrote:
>
> Peter Trei <trei@process.com> writes:
> > Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com> writes:
> > > There may be a distributed Internet crack using that approach,
> > > though DES is still very inefficient on general-purpose computers and
> > > works better on bit-twiddliing chips.
> >
> > There's one slowly shaping up, organized by the same people who did
> > the RC5-48 crack. I'm still rooting for an uncoordinated search,
> > which is already underway.
>
> The people who did the RC5-48 crack over on <des-challenge@muffin.org>,
> and <des-pr@mail.des-challenge.xtn.net>, or at least one of them in
> particular, seems dead set on giving the prize fund 50:50 to the EFF/GNU.
> I'm having a heck of a time talking him out of it.
http://zero.genx.net/ is going at it as well - and whoever finds the key
gets the prize.
What's wrong with EFF/GNU?
-- Elliot Lee
http://www.redhat.com/ http://www.linuxexpo.org/
Return to February 1997
Return to “Elliot Lee <sopwith@cuc.edu>”
1997-02-21 (Thu, 20 Feb 1997 19:11:03 -0800 (PST)) - Re: DES search publicity (was Re: Cryptanalysis) - Elliot Lee <sopwith@cuc.edu>