1997-02-07 - Re: lead remailer is shut down

Header Data

From: bs-org@c2.net
To: zinc@zifi.genetics.utah.edu
Message Hash: d423386cb7289f0cc74ed51a043544c98406b6cadae1f8ef41c067a3995a0152
Message ID: <1.5.4.16.19970207225846.2fffa470@c2.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-07 22:59:02 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 14:59:02 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: bs-org@c2.net
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 14:59:02 -0800 (PST)
To: zinc@zifi.genetics.utah.edu
Subject: Re: lead remailer is shut down
Message-ID: <1.5.4.16.19970207225846.2fffa470@c2.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 11:58 1997-02-07 -0800, Ed Falk wrote:
>
>Can't remailers be written with basic spam safeguards?  I.e. no mass
>crossposts, limited # of posts by each individual client per day, etc.?

Can anybody give me the address of reliable remailer which accepts
pgp messages.

BTW which remailer was shut down and why?









Thread