1997-02-07 - Re: lead remailer is shut down
Header Data
From: bs-org@c2.net
To: zinc@zifi.genetics.utah.edu
Message Hash: d423386cb7289f0cc74ed51a043544c98406b6cadae1f8ef41c067a3995a0152
Message ID: <1.5.4.16.19970207225846.2fffa470@c2.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-07 22:59:02 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 14:59:02 -0800 (PST)
Raw message
From: bs-org@c2.net
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 14:59:02 -0800 (PST)
To: zinc@zifi.genetics.utah.edu
Subject: Re: lead remailer is shut down
Message-ID: <1.5.4.16.19970207225846.2fffa470@c2.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 11:58 1997-02-07 -0800, Ed Falk wrote:
>
>Can't remailers be written with basic spam safeguards? I.e. no mass
>crossposts, limited # of posts by each individual client per day, etc.?
Can anybody give me the address of reliable remailer which accepts
pgp messages.
BTW which remailer was shut down and why?
Thread
Return to February 1997
Return to “bs-org@c2.net”
1997-02-07 (Fri, 7 Feb 1997 14:59:02 -0800 (PST)) - Re: lead remailer is shut down - bs-org@c2.net