From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d6380f313128d3453495ddf804974802df5cf6ddbdc51fc2df3f8e7434520c0c
Message ID: <1.5.4.32.19970207231058.006c5e4c@pop.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-07 23:16:43 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 15:16:43 -0800 (PST)
From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 15:16:43 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Is Sandy really censoring criticisms of Stronghold, his product?
Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19970207231058.006c5e4c@pop.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
My version of DV's ploy came via the unedited list.
There was also a good, brief discussion about Vulis's multi-pronged
Denial of Service attack on Cypherpunks, which came unedited, along
with other informative comments about how a technologically adept
attacker singles out a quarry amongst a lumbering, slumbering, cud-
chewing herd. Quite beastly cryptoanarchistic.
Return to February 1997
Return to “John Young <jya@pipeline.com>”
1997-02-07 (Fri, 7 Feb 1997 15:16:43 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Is Sandy really censoring criticisms of Stronghold, his product? - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>