1997-02-09 - Re: Passphrase generation

Header Data

From: Jeremiah A Blatz <jer+@andrew.cmu.edu>
To: unde0275@frank.mtsu.edu>
Message Hash: da6589f2174d1ac7725018402c5446eac84d20b58f5445529b02754f5beebb51
Message ID: <0mzXk_200YUf021bA0@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply To: <01BC1675.656788C0@s17-pm04.tnstate.campus.mci.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-09 21:06:02 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 13:06:02 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Jeremiah A Blatz <jer+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 1997 13:06:02 -0800 (PST)
To: unde0275@frank.mtsu.edu>
Subject: Re: Passphrase generation
In-Reply-To: <01BC1675.656788C0@s17-pm04.tnstate.campus.mci.net>
Message-ID: <0mzXk_200YUf021bA0@andrew.cmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Internaut <unde0275@frank.mtsu.edu> writes:
> Hi,
> I am wanting to learn how to generate a passphrase that is at least as 
> strong as the IDEA algorithm.  I have looked several other places on the 
> web for an answer to this, but they all had different things to say that 
> didn't add up (no pun intended :).

Chech out the cannonical passphrase FAQ:
http://www.stack.nl/~galactus/remailers/passphrase-faq.html

This one has some quick reminders of what to do and not to do
http://www.encryption.com/pphrase.htm

Bottom line, totally random ASCII will have lots of bits per
character, but english has about 1.2 bits per character. Misspellings
can add to that, depending on the extent of mutillation . Combining
certain words can make your passphrase weaker (such as "To be or not
to be," "This is my passphrase," etc.).

HTH,
Jer

"standing on top of the world/ never knew how you never could/ never knew
 why you never could live/ innocent life that everyone did" -Wormhole

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQB1AwUBMv48Bskz/YzIV3P5AQGSaQMAjrTuhDUZ4THFFN9wgV8DhODJtHSGnmBM
EPmo02rXsN4gslmVpV9+k7sRTOvuZ+vCYvNQL+knaMz4QiNsz8FUleUqo3v5Nx1w
7pJjcWK1wvKe9Y6ky6PXnAECRZ73gVuj
=P1Zh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread