From: Eric Cordian <emc@wire.insync.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: de48abae169126c424c821f59948acd01e0464a4a1ffdf9bd86502d18a282709
Message ID: <199702140611.WAA23316@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-14 06:11:24 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 22:11:24 -0800 (PST)
From: Eric Cordian <emc@wire.insync.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 22:11:24 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: alt.cypherpunks
Message-ID: <199702140611.WAA23316@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mr. Blatz writes:
> alt.cypherpunks has been newgroup'ed, and I belive rm'grouped. Smart,
> consiencous newsadmins probably did not honor the rmgroup, as
> alt.cypherpunks should be acceptable, but most newsadmins are too
> overworked to actually look at most of the crap that comes through.
> For example, it hasn't received any messages on my news server,
> probably because the one upstream removed it.
I haven't seen any rmgroups for alt.cypherpunks. Paul Bradley's
newgroup for alt.cypherpunks is nowhere to be found, but Mike Duvos'
newgroup made it onto the Net, and was reposted the next day by
usenet@news.myriad.ml.org.
Meanwhile, Paul Bradley seems to have finally figured out newgrouping
and has created...
alt.cypherpunks.announce
alt.cypherpunks.social
alt.cypherpunks.technical
and, of course...
alt.fan.paul.bradley
The latter has been rmgrouped because it was not discussed in
alt.config.
I might suggest that deliberately tweeking the whiskers of the Cabal by
gratuitous newgrouping is unlikely to bode well for alt.cypherpunks.
--
Eric Michael Cordian 0+
O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division
"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"
Return to February 1997
Return to “Eric Cordian <emc@wire.insync.net>”
1997-02-14 (Thu, 13 Feb 1997 22:11:24 -0800 (PST)) - Re: alt.cypherpunks - Eric Cordian <emc@wire.insync.net>