From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org
Message Hash: e00739a8ec5df0b9b72ec5f69a7eff09787612dd3f20b313aaa8a1846f68da89
Message ID: <330C6F05.7ACB@gte.net>
Reply To: <iNLe3D11w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-20 15:35:09 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 07:35:09 -0800 (PST)
From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 07:35:09 -0800 (PST)
To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org
Subject: Re: All Hail Emperor Lewis! (was: Re: status: shoppingplanet jan 20
In-Reply-To: <iNLe3D11w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Message-ID: <330C6F05.7ACB@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Toto wrote:
> Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
> > These working examples also prove the other point I have found myself
> > having to repeat... i.e. that anyone who posts to USENET news is trivially
> > ``cullable'', and that E-mail spammers can have all of the E-mail addresses
> > they could ever hope to use any day of the week.
> Did you notice that when the 'censorship experiment' on the CypherPunks
> list was abandoned, that Greg Broiles called for the list to be 'killed'?
> Did you notice that when he was ignored, that he then changed his
> postition to suggest that UseNet was the proper forum for continuing
> the list?
Life is too complicated, ya' know? I just wanna know who is this
PATTI SHOCK <shock@nevada.edu> person, who's allegedly calling for
a moderation of some forum on Usenet. The way I see it, if she's a
real babe, somebody should fix her up with some censored material
just to keep her happy. Then just let some really mean, dirty
material through once a month or so, just so she knows the process
is working, and protecting her from all sorts of hideous stuff.
OTOH, if she's a Chelsea Clinton look-alike, why bother?
Return to February 1997
Return to “Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>”
Unknown thread root