1997-02-14 - Re: Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer (fwd)

Header Data

From: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: edd8f83eb028ff0a57b71423948189f76024dcd2d204bd2c343385ef21911814
Message ID: <199702140127.RAA15949@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-14 01:27:17 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 17:27:17 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 17:27:17 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer (fwd)
Message-ID: <199702140127.RAA15949@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Forwarded message:

> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 13:50 EDT
> From: "E. Allen Smith" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.rutgers.edu>
> Subject: Re: Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer (fwd)

> 	Well, if you can't deliver mail because their mailbox is full, then
> you should simply wait a few days before trying to deliver mail to that
> address. If it's because the address isn't there any more, you should delete
> it from the subscription lists. Otherwise, the instant people's mail quotas
> overflow (e.g., they're on AOL and they haven't been able to get through the
> clogged lines), they get bounced... or you're left with a lot of invalid
> addresses.

If their mailbox is full I might let it sit a day. If I still get a bounce
after that I currently yank it. As I stated earlier, I am currently trying to
decide if daily or weekly purges are in order. I personaly lean toward daily.
I certainly am not buying disk space just so somebody else can use it for
storing things they don't personaly have room for.

> The address causing the bounce is not necessarily determinable
> automatically from the bounce message; if it isn't, then you need to keep a
> copy around for a human to look at.

Hmmm, to date I haven't had a problem determining where the cause was
from the bounces I see. I can't always tell why but it always seems to
say whose email address was involved.

> 	Given that there are pre-existing news-mail gateways, I'd think that
> the programs should be available. My concern on the programming is more in
> the realm of keeping the thing up and running.

If you get it up and running there should be no programming involved. Unless
you want to reconfigure.


                                                     Jim Choate
                                                     CyberTects
                                                     ravage@ssz.com







Thread