1997-02-21 - Re: Revisionism Was: Another email address forgery Was: REPOST: Re: Robert Br

Header Data

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org
Message Hash: f24523fec02fa50eb88f3cb3e9037e0a139de04bbe393830b7a9efdc716df083
Message ID: <330D3E32.393C@gte.net>
Reply To: <199702202308.PAA24681@kachina.jetcafe.org>
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-21 06:19:09 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 22:19:09 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 22:19:09 -0800 (PST)
To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org
Subject: Re: Revisionism Was: Another email address forgery Was: REPOST: Re: Robert Br
In-Reply-To: <199702202308.PAA24681@kachina.jetcafe.org>
Message-ID: <330D3E32.393C@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


ISP_Ratings wrote:
> Dave Hayes wrote:
> > Toto writes:
> >>   Canada has a set of anti-hate laws that say that if Joe Average says
> >> "Martin Looter King is a doo-doo", then he can be put in prison for
> >> 40,000 years.

> > That's absolutely ludicrous. Anti-hate laws only serve to make people
> > hate the laws. Legislating emotions is quite impossible, not to
> > mention downright scary.

>   Canada is one of the worst in the Western World--they have all sorts
> of censorous nonsense on the books and seem almost as bad as Germany.
> They don't allow certain political stuff like revisionism, etc. even
> though quite obviously the best answer to revisionism is the very
> crap they produce.  Trying to surpress that viewpoint just makes it
> all the more powerful.

Pardon my intrusion, but doesn't revisionism allow suppressed people
to recover at least some of their history (in the official sense),
and since when is it not legitimate to re-investigate anything at all?






Thread