1997-02-03 - Re: PCS Encryption?

Header Data

From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Message Hash: f84cf28d25a5a1d0393dfb2a6304479a3f5861d34d487887badeba0bc2d822bc
Message ID: <1.5.4.32.19970203160358.006b87a4@pop.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-03 16:09:41 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 08:09:41 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 08:09:41 -0800 (PST)
To: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Subject: Re: PCS Encryption?
Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19970203160358.006b87a4@pop.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>	I was under the impression that Fortezza was ok for classified
>traffic.  Did I miss the changeover, was it unannounced, or was I
>simply misremembering?

Fortezza now comes in several implementations for various, variable
and multiple levels of classification and message handling. There is info on 
latest mani-dexterous products at NSA's armadillo and missi sites.

If you don't want to be logged by NSA, see the Mykronyx bouquet at:

   http://jya.com/fortezza.htm

To be sure, you might get logged anyway: jya.com may have been
approved by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts for a 
snoop.






Thread