From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
To: “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: fdcbaa47d7af523f7b50bd94e67eee43d3f4462eed289c33152a3b233221e5e3
Message ID: <199702172056.MAA13556@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-17 20:56:36 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 12:56:36 -0800 (PST)
From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 12:56:36 -0800 (PST)
To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: The Science Generations, II
Message-ID: <199702172056.MAA13556@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mr. May wrote:
> Some legal scholars are claiming that there is no provision in the
> Constitution guaranteeing anonymity of purchases, and, indeed, a growing
> number of purchases can no longer be anonymous--guns, explosives, chemicals
> of various sorts, etc. How long before _all_ transactions must be recorded,
> True Names revealed, etc.?
This is where I often get a little confused.
Correct me if I am wrong, but it was my understanding that the
constitutuion was _not_ a document that explicitly spelled out what writes
_I_ had, but rather spelled out fairly precisely what the _government_ was
allowed to do.
In otherwords, the Constitution does not restrict _me_ rather it
restricts the _feds_ (and the Feds alone).
My rights are WHATEVER ISN'T IN THE CONSTITUTION, and the government
can only, ONLY do what the constitution says it can.
???
Return to February 1997
Return to “snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>”