1997-02-17 - Re: The Science Generations, II

Header Data

From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
To: “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: fdcbaa47d7af523f7b50bd94e67eee43d3f4462eed289c33152a3b233221e5e3
Message ID: <199702172056.MAA13556@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-17 20:56:36 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 12:56:36 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 12:56:36 -0800 (PST)
To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: The Science Generations, II
Message-ID: <199702172056.MAA13556@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Mr. May wrote:
> Some legal scholars are claiming that there is no provision in the
> Constitution guaranteeing anonymity of purchases, and, indeed, a growing
> number of purchases can no longer be anonymous--guns, explosives, chemicals
> of various sorts, etc. How long before _all_ transactions must be recorded,
> True Names revealed, etc.?

	This is where I often get a little confused.

	Correct me if I am wrong, but it was my understanding that the
constitutuion was _not_ a document that explicitly spelled out what writes 
_I_ had, but rather spelled out fairly precisely what the _government_ was 
allowed to do.

	In otherwords, the Constitution does not restrict _me_ rather it 
restricts the _feds_ (and the Feds alone).

	My rights are WHATEVER ISN'T IN THE CONSTITUTION, and the government
can only, ONLY do what the constitution says it can.

	???








Thread