From: Peter Trei <ptrei@ACM.ORG>
To: Steve Schear <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: fe98452de5cd86cd93996b6efe2edeb7cd1c20d79f71693e8762e4e59ef79c85
Message ID: <199702041512.HAA29212@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-04 15:12:42 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 07:12:42 -0800 (PST)
From: Peter Trei <ptrei@ACM.ORG>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 07:12:42 -0800 (PST)
To: Steve Schear <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: GAK/KR spin
Message-ID: <199702041512.HAA29212@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 14:34:49 -0800
> From: Steve Schear <azur@netcom.com>
> To: cypherpunks@toad.com
> Subject: GAK/KR spin
> Several months back there were discussions on the list regarding renaming
> the government's key escrow/recovery proposals (KRAP comes to mind). I
> think we need something that's catchy and simple (perhaps already familiar)
> to understand for the semi-litterate citizen units. I propose we encourage
> use of the terms "crippleware" or "crypto crippleware" when refering to the
> products limited to their weak crypto and/or key escrow/recovery.
>
> --Steve
For some time, I have been using the term 'espionage-enabled
software' to describe GAK'd products. Also, 'compromised
software' - I want to make the point that 'key escrow/recovery' ==
insecure.'
Peter Trei
trei@process.com
PS: I have SW for working on the $10,000 DES challenge available.
Return to February 1997
Return to “Peter Trei <ptrei@ACM.ORG>”
1997-02-04 (Tue, 4 Feb 1997 07:12:42 -0800 (PST)) - Re: GAK/KR spin - Peter Trei <ptrei@ACM.ORG>