1997-03-22 - Re: Market Failures, Monocultures, and Dead Kids (Oh My!)

Header Data

From: lucifer@dhp.com (lucifer Anonymous Remailer)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2c2d84b8e4e860c8bdb7a2a9757f8827228fdcca8b979d992f0c1fc4efe75c38
Message ID: <199703220217.VAA24062@dhp.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-03-22 02:17:28 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 18:17:28 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: lucifer@dhp.com (lucifer Anonymous Remailer)
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 1997 18:17:28 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Market Failures, Monocultures, and Dead Kids (Oh My!)
Message-ID: <199703220217.VAA24062@dhp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


                        BELIEVE the children!

Vulis wrote:
> Out in the hobbsian wild, if the parents abuse their offsprings (kill them,
> fail to train them), then the offsprings won't reproduce and the parent's
> genes won't perpetuate.  Do we really need a more coersive system of
> punishing "child abuse"?

	We don't (yet) live in the "hobbsian wild". Children do what they are 
taught. If the are taught to react to the slightest provocation with violence,
then they will, when they grow up (notice I didn't say mature), react similarly.
If we wish to live in a society of reasonable people, our children need to 
be raised respond reasonably to provocation. This means get violent when, and
only when necessary. 

	So, yes. I would say we need a fairly coersive system for punishing 
child abuse. We also need a clear defination of what child abuse really is.

                        BELIEVE the children!







Thread