1997-03-28 - Re: OECD: No GAK

Header Data

From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
Message Hash: 3c76666ce3da70318c839e57563d390d73195ef52798f3a4a3e379d70ab721c8
Message ID: <1.5.4.32.19970328041159.00708088@pop.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-03-28 04:19:45 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 20:19:45 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 20:19:45 -0800 (PST)
To: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@amaranth.com>
Subject: Re: OECD: No GAK
Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19970328041159.00708088@pop.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>Is this in reference to the various GAK initiatives by the administration
>or are they finally pushing for forced restrictions on domestic crypto? Has
>anyone seen these drafts?

I assume that the draft KRAP legislation at CDT Peter Junger cited 
here is what Markoff refers to:

   http://www.cdt.org/crypto/970312_admin.html

Anyone know of other KR/TTF drafts in the US, UK, FR, JP, AU or elsewhere
among the 29 signators of Wassenaar?

The Wassenaariors have a wider ambition than the OECDistes.








Thread