1997-03-31 - Re: Privacy? Not in Canada!

Header Data

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
To: nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)
Message Hash: 54c13660000a3c4a4f40345d8f596b8495af2e5b04df6f731ba03741ee5579d9
Message ID: <199703311446.JAA06398@homeport.org>
Reply To: <199703311428.GAA19876@fat.doobie.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-03-31 14:49:51 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 06:49:51 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 06:49:51 -0800 (PST)
To: nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)
Subject: Re: Privacy? Not in Canada!
In-Reply-To: <199703311428.GAA19876@fat.doobie.com>
Message-ID: <199703311446.JAA06398@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


	The Canadian privacy commissioner usually sends several people
to the CFP conference each year.  I've had good conversations with
them, and would be very suprised to see them as anything other than
opponents of this measure.

	Canadians might want to get in touch with them to voice
concern.

Adam


| CRIMINALS WON'T BE THE ONLY TARGETS
| 
| Criminals won't be the only targets if strong non-escrowed encryption is
| outlawed although criminals provide a convenient excuse for governments
| seeking to extend their power over their own citizens.

-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume







Thread