From: “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
To: “Igor Chudov @ home” <ichudov@algebra.com>
Message Hash: 5af6ac56340b15e8dcce487aa4c310ebf6c460fabd7a9e0b01ab411d89e3b0bf
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970320231526.945A-100000@purple.voicenet.com>
Reply To: <199703210116.TAA12097@manifold.algebra.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-03-21 04:32:59 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 20:32:59 -0800 (PST)
From: "Mark M." <markm@voicenet.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 20:32:59 -0800 (PST)
To: "Igor Chudov @ home" <ichudov@algebra.com>
Subject: Re: PGP Security
In-Reply-To: <199703210116.TAA12097@manifold.algebra.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970320231526.945A-100000@purple.voicenet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thu, 20 Mar 1997, Igor Chudov @ home wrote:
> This is mostly addressed to jimbell: jim, it is now obvious that
> the remailer network is as weak as a 5 year old child. It cannot
> possibly withstand even mildest forms of "abuse".
>
> Due to this fact, I question the viability of your assassination
> politics idea as it does not seem possible to safely operate an
> assassination bot.
The fundamental problem with the current remailer network, as others have
noted before, is that it is a free service open to abuse by anyone. If
remailers were commercialized, this would eliminate the spam problem and would
provide the remailer operator with resources to legally defend him or herself.
Currently, there is no modivation for an operator to continue the service when
legally threatened.
(As an interesting sidenote, a few hours ago John Perry announced on r-ops
that due to an FBI investigation into the use of his remailer to mail threats
to some apparently influential person, he has shut down the jpunix remailer.)
Consider the fact that Cyberpromo has managed to find an upstream provider
willing to provide connectivity to them, even though they are almost
universally hated by net users. They have been able to exist because there
is a commercial interest. I do not doubt that the same would be true for
remailers if they were commercialized. The only thing that could shut
remailers down would be either legislation or seizing the computers on which
the remailers run as "evidence." The obvious solution to this would be to run
remailers in more civilized countries.
Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: noconv
iQEVAwUBMzIQwSzIPc7jvyFpAQEQ9gf/aUCNWXtqAZlM2Qi8peAxR1UFfnhdyiBp
eRbl6Rajy7dmf5Kuy7rRj2eLrRQFS/MBp/404urtZm7rUo70T6G2e5O+qae9VDBC
FAH8DIDSRffH47jB9xcY/14rwFo7/IG2Kd4l/jmP7SyClCwP/CU1a3+yASFVJFw3
9A8S2sKjJevyXjMLFFBWCuo3ZPVKFJfmxV9yCmNWREXjW4moKtgNGHL7tgGQrev3
LtTGBCeVmSI5WCJsEn6EOVzLHFSx7kndfXLfULIHwPRIbHQuEv1qNGZu3dj8CJ4G
HxDw4gU3ZDGANQ+5VveB6yddiivU1bjAXXhiOskLnZsSz1V6y8KwTA==
=LyRp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to March 1997
Return to ““Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>”