From: “E. Allen Smith” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: jya@pipeline.com
Message Hash: 70bfb8950ad9127a79f0b5781294b78b2deaab46f68217ef4124dbdd35911bca
Message ID: <01IG1JJZ4MCG8Y5BPD@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-03-03 03:08:25 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 19:08:25 -0800 (PST)
From: "E. Allen Smith" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 19:08:25 -0800 (PST)
To: jya@pipeline.com
Subject: Re: Pro-CODE Bill
Message-ID: <01IG1JJZ4MCG8Y5BPD@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Upon looking over the bill in question
(helpfully provided in a more accessible location
by jya), I do have some concerns over whether it
allows for anonymous remailer export - it has a
provision stating
Nothing in this Act may be construed to affect any law intended to prevent the-
(2) illegal or unauthorized distribution or release of classified, confidential, or
proprietary information; or
(3) enforcement of Federal or State criminal law.
Which causes some question in my mind whether it
would cover laws against or discouraging anonymous
remailers. (While the Supreme Court would probably
find outlawing anonymous remailers to be unconstitutional,
laws discouraging their export or other lesser forms of
harrassment might still pass muster, unfortunately.)
-Allen
Return to March 1997
Return to ““E. Allen Smith” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>”
1997-03-03 (Sun, 2 Mar 1997 19:08:25 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Pro-CODE Bill - “E. Allen Smith” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>