From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
To: dthorn@gte.net
Message Hash: 764c2bbeee3ec92ecf528723f17f91e2fb9b348fa8bd351e1b8aaf17595f88f4
Message ID: <199703131139.FAA11708@manifold.algebra.com>
Reply To: <3327A11F.16D4@gte.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-03-13 12:07:35 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 13 Mar 1997 04:07:35 -0800 (PST)
From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 1997 04:07:35 -0800 (PST)
To: dthorn@gte.net
Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] OTP
In-Reply-To: <3327A11F.16D4@gte.net>
Message-ID: <199703131139.FAA11708@manifold.algebra.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
Dale Thorn wrote:
>
> Igor Chudov @ home wrote:
> > Graham-John Bullers wrote:
> > > Vulis time to take your pills.
>
> > I am not a native English speaker, and am curious about something. Mr.
> > GB does not put a comma after "Vulis", although I think that a standard
> > English practice is to do so. That makes his messages look kinda cute. I
> > wonder whether there is any hidden meaning in omitting commas in this case.
>
> It was obvious to me (a native speaker) early on that the messages
> from GB referring to Dr. Vulis were auto-generated. It's fairly
> easy for a human to type in the exact same response over and over
> (doing so manually), but to vary the hand-typed messages, while main-
> taining the complete lack of emotion and sense of robotic blandness,
> would require a great deal of attention that these messages would
> not justify.
>
dale,
i am sure they are not machine generated. the content is different
every time, plus it srt of depends on the context to which he is replying.
like, if vulis's article is about sexual perversions, GB calls him a
pervert.
one still could do that in perl, but it is not likely to be the case
- Igor.
Return to March 1997
Return to “nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)”