1997-03-03 - Re: Depends / Re: Senate spams

Header Data

From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
To: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Message Hash: 772795934437035f37f9330e03b142161e358e7097e199a8aaafa77f8b4280e2
Message ID: <331A7D73.5CEA@sk.sympatico.ca>
Reply To: <199703030651.AAA01558@smoke.suba.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-03-03 07:25:53 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 23:25:53 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 23:25:53 -0800 (PST)
To: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Subject: Re: Depends / Re: Senate spams
In-Reply-To: <199703030651.AAA01558@smoke.suba.com>
Message-ID: <331A7D73.5CEA@sk.sympatico.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


snow wrote:

>         I think that any reasonable person could assume that missives f
> from "mailer-daemon" could safely be excluded from the list. It is doubtful
> that anyone out there has such a login, and if they do, well, it is stupid
> enough that ignoring it would be doing them a favor (After a while they
> _might_ get the idea that no one with a clue SENDS mail  "mailer-deamon",
> and change their login.

  I'd like to see a show of hands to see how many list members have 
received any posts from nancy.net/sally.net/conentric.net that they
didn't personally delete without reading.
  These people don't seem to realize that the CypherPunks aren't 
interested in finding out how to "Make Big $$$ At Home, Licking Your
Own Dick", because we do it anyway, without any expectations other 
than our own, personal reward.

  I do find snow's post rather embarassing, however, since I just sent 
an email asking mailer-daemon to marry me.
  It's bad enough being rejected, but being auto-rejected really cuts
to the bone.
-- 
Toto
http://bureau42.base.org/public/xenix/xenbody.html






Thread