From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
To: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Message Hash: 7841eed33663774635b8ce92b8c382f1acb39e6d090d1720d505bf4c8b6e1e8a
Message ID: <199703122235.QAA06717@manifold.algebra.com>
Reply To: <uTyg4D1w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-03-12 22:39:17 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 12 Mar 1997 14:39:17 -0800 (PST)
From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 1997 14:39:17 -0800 (PST)
To: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Subject: Re: Mail Volume??
In-Reply-To: <uTyg4D1w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Message-ID: <199703122235.QAA06717@manifold.algebra.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
>
> "Cynthia H. Brown" <cynthb@sonetis.com> writes:
> > Perhaps many of the 1400-odd subscribers belonged to unused accounts, or
> > accounts on dead systems. With fewer names to process, this should speed
> > up the distribution significantly.
>
> FWIW, onthe few occasions when I e-mailed the 1400 addresses directly, I got
> hundreds of bounces from nonexistent addresses. I guess the 1400 silent
> supporters of moderation were another one of John Gilmore's lies.
I once, as a prank, sent mail to cypherpunks-outgoing-ksiuw@toad.com.
Since cypherpunks-outgoing-ksiuw is a simple sendmail alias, all bounces
went directly to me as my name was listed in the "From " field.
I got about a hundred or so bounces, some of which were results of
intermittent problems like full mailboxes, etc. (the actual number could
be 90% likely between 50 and 150 as I was not really counting).
- Igor.
Return to March 1997
Return to “ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)”