1997-03-20 - Re: Isn’t this like a bad idea?

Header Data

From: “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
To: Lile Elam <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7c03cb451cdfa0c47284221a20cd0b146e3bb526bd43222a1ead2dfe93ac4e56
Message ID: <v03007805af5763780d26@[207.167.93.63]>
Reply To: <199703202045.MAA16675@art.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-03-20 21:49:35 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 13:49:35 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 13:49:35 -0800 (PST)
To: Lile Elam <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Isn't this like a bad idea?
In-Reply-To: <199703202045.MAA16675@art.net>
Message-ID: <v03007805af5763780d26@[207.167.93.63]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 12:45 PM -0800 3/20/97, Lile Elam wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>Selling email addresses seems to me to be a bad idea. Wouldn't
>it be better to have people sign up instead of this? I mean,
>it looks like this is for spammers.
>
>Who can I contact about this abuse?
>

It may be tacky and undesirable, but public information is just that, public.

(I don't mean some quasi-legalistic distinction between "public" and
"private," as defined by regulators, I mean information publically
accessible.)

If one wants something kept private, use privacy tools.

(And as Cypherpunks know so well, if regulators/legislators attempt to
interfere in such markets, the markets will simply move to other
jurisdictions, or into cyphersace.)

--Tim May

Just say "No" to "Big Brother Inside"
We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, I know that that ain't allowed.
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May              | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
tcmay@got.net  408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA  | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Higher Power: 2^1398269     | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."









Thread