From: Jonathan Gaw <jonathan@gaw.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9ed0bc4459ab165cd0966cc2f9ea963054c638b0c514bf32481c9bc5bf02e39f
Message ID: <3.0.32.19970323023551.00688610@pconline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-03-23 08:36:21 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 23 Mar 1997 00:36:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Jonathan Gaw <jonathan@gaw.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 1997 00:36:21 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: "why privacy" revisit
Message-ID: <3.0.32.19970323023551.00688610@pconline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
the responses i've gotten have been all too theoretical and, i believe, too
hypothetical and removed for most people. when asked if they value their
privacy, the public overwhelmingly agrees. when asked what their privacy
means to them, i don't think they have a solid answer. i get the sense that
most people don't see the hazards of corporations analyzing their buying
patterns, voter registration records and medical records. i don't think it
has come home to most people.
i don't disagree with the people on the list. i am just having a hard time
translating it to the public in concrete terms.
j.
>
>At 09:50 PM 3/22/97 -0500, you wrote:
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>
>> -=> Quoting In:jonathan@gaw.net to Harka <=-
>>
>> In> when i talk to people like the Direct Marketer's Assn., they honestly
>> In> don't understand what the fuss is about. Their attitude is, quite
>> In> literally, "What's the harm being done here?"
>>
>> In> what do you think the community interested in privacy protection can
>> In> do to best illustrate to the general public the "harm" in the
>> In> collection of personal information?
>>
>>Information warfare. Collect information about DMA people, using
>>their own weapons against them. Then post it somewhere on the
>>Internet via remailers and cc themselves, Reuters and the New York
>>Times...
>>
>>Ciao
>>
>>Harka
>>___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30 [NR]
>>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>Version: 2.6.2
>>
>>iQEVAgUBMzSWbzltEBIEF0MBAQFOzQf/SmUYerwG8oIDVe+PucyAybBAYpMBl+JT
>>eDl21Bs0jVa2+UXm8zDKQVDIkz004bTgpyX6vzockZ8cTUkW1UJJucjUfAXln1yB
>>HmdR9Go5mdurGbXf4QSN47nbfPc5V5sq8h7Ok2frFRqKLBejPSuEdP2pZo0OUPQD
>>bf0lE3l5lgTKlYqOzHt7NqHNAlcx3l0FOpflF+RR5DbLllBrIP7XYodMLMv+NR3T
>>V0oEk0woReL4+/O8iQ1oZuQ3MHNXkwCqR8w2wXnlou9ysfS58nTXgoNyFYKouGlN
>>Kc1bV2/G6mrG8PziTd3MsTL4TjdcmkdphZWVouo1LrEuhd3J5B4dBw==
>>=rbtn
>>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>>If encryption is outlawed, only outlaws will have encryption...
>>
>>
>>
******************************************************
Jonathan Gaw
The Star Tribune
Minneapolis, Minnesota
jonathan@gaw.net
*********Wasting Digital Bandwidth Since 1986*********
Return to March 1997
Return to ““Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>”