From: Pete Loshin <pete@loshin.com>
To: Vin McLellan <rah@shipwright.com>
Message Hash: bbbe13143488e56e88f78b73dfd080bb9576e94c76c5042c43eb48ded31b1fd8
Message ID: <3.0.32.19970320214022.00874db0@pop.tiac.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-03-21 04:16:33 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 20:16:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Pete Loshin <pete@loshin.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 20:16:33 -0800 (PST)
To: Vin McLellan <rah@shipwright.com>
Subject: Re: ONK?: SANS Network Security Digest?
Message-ID: <3.0.32.19970320214022.00874db0@pop.tiac.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Thanks for the information. I basically just wanted someone involved (or
someone who knows someone involved) to say, yes, this thing is real.
How come they don't sign it? If I were a sysadmin subscriber, I'd probably
be inclined to want to be able to certify the contents got to me intact.
regards,
-pl
At 05:40 PM 3/20/97 -0500, Vin McLellan wrote:
[stuff deleted]
>The SANS Network Security Digest is published via email approximately
>eight times per year. It's purpose is to help busy sysadmins and
>security professionals gain confidence that they are aware of the
>important security vulnerabilities and what can be done to resolve them.
[more stuff deleted]
Return to March 1997
Return to “Pete Loshin <pete@loshin.com>”
1997-03-21 (Thu, 20 Mar 1997 20:16:33 -0800 (PST)) - Re: ONK?: SANS Network Security Digest? - Pete Loshin <pete@loshin.com>