From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: cf4af17f983a04aec90cbb19e14652e5c728979bdc5f4eae621373a991a30fa7
Message ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970327164811.18792B-100000@well.com>
Reply To: <v03007800af60b73611b5@[207.167.93.63]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-03-28 00:50:45 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 16:50:45 -0800 (PST)
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 16:50:45 -0800 (PST)
To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: heavensgate.com?
In-Reply-To: <v03007800af60b73611b5@[207.167.93.63]>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970327164811.18792B-100000@well.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I was typing quickly and carelessly. If you want to send me something
that's anonymous *and* encrypted, that's when my public key would come in
handy.
That invitation still stands, of course, for anyone who wants to pass
along any info on the Heaven's Gate organization.
Anyway, we put a mirror up at:
http://pathfinder.com/news/breaking/site.html
-Declan
On Thu, 27 Mar 1997, Timothy C. May wrote:
> At 2:43 PM -0500 3/27/97, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> >Does anyone have a copy of the heavensgate.com web pages?
>
> >If you want to send something anonymously, finger -l declan@eff.org for my
> >PGP public key.
>
> Wouldn't just using an anonymous remailer work better? Encrypting a message
> to your public key and then mailing it will not preserve sender anonymity.
>
> Doing both would maybe be better, but for casual journalistic
> whistleblowing, the remailers are more important than encrypting to the
> recipient (unless Declan fears interception at _his_ site).
>
> (Am I missing something?)
>
> --Tim, whose parents live less than two miles from the Departure Zone for
> the Hale-Bopp Shuttlecraft
>
> (P.S. Does this mean the San Diego Cypherpunks meetings will be more
> lightly attended?)
Return to March 1997
Return to ““Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>”