From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
To: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
Message Hash: d17521f363165d13a52dc18c1c9e7978db643befb1154bbcb7dc9e8b48f96092
Message ID: <1.5.4.32.19970305170449.00731050@pop.pipeline.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-03-05 17:11:50 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 09:11:50 -0800 (PST)
From: John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 09:11:50 -0800 (PST)
To: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
Subject: Re: ECPA/1997: the other shoe?
Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19970305170449.00731050@pop.pipeline.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Thanks for pointing this. We got a TXT version from GPO Access
and put it at:
http://jya.com/s376.txt
With a link to your HTML.
On Waasenaar, we've written a few folks about finding a full copy, but
so far the word is the same as State's: none has been publically released.
Hope you get it.
When the pact was first discussed at State a recorder transcribed
"Vasinor (phonetic)," so that term might turn up in searches.
As you noted, for those interested, we've put a few Waasenaar docs at:
http://jya.com/acda.htm
Back to your FOIA to CIA, and the Agency's referral to FCC: I wonder if
there might not be something to that lead. As you must know, the legislation
covering national telecommunications security puts the FCC in the center
of infowehr C4I. Excuse this cite to a pro citer, the NatSec Telecomm
leg is at:
http://jya.com/47cfr2.htm
This might support the CIA's intel that FCC is the chokepoint for CPI for
the IC.
Return to March 1997
Return to “John Young <jya@pipeline.com>”
1997-03-05 (Wed, 5 Mar 1997 09:11:50 -0800 (PST)) - Re: ECPA/1997: the other shoe? - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>