1997-03-06 - RE: Microsoft Authenticode key security

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: e8fa0bffd091c8975f5a25c9aff982bb7fccb5e802a9e15cd8bc7195b39afdb5
Message ID: <L0c53D131w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <7D9A01DBBFD5CF11AD0F0000F8411F8A42697E@ROADKILL>
UTC Datetime: 1997-03-06 02:30:44 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 18:30:44 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 18:30:44 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: RE: Microsoft Authenticode key security
In-Reply-To: <7D9A01DBBFD5CF11AD0F0000F8411F8A42697E@ROADKILL>
Message-ID: <L0c53D131w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


"Bob Atkinson (Exchange)" <bobatk@EXCHANGE.MICROSOFT.com> writes:

> Actually, and sort of to the point, no, the keys never actually ever the
> BBN box, except as part of a backup procedure in which they are
> extracted in a doubly-encrypted form for which for security reasons you
> need the manufacturer's help in restoring.
>
> To this day, no human or computer other than the box itself knows the

But do we necessarily believe what Microsoft people say?

Dimitri "bought OS/2 1.0 from Microsoft" Vulis

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps





Thread