From: “Peter Trei” <trei@process.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 53b526eeeeb8390a1080698bdc3a41b16c7af2da7c7a0fd73de346062575b4e6
Message ID: <199704071313.GAA18158@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-04-07 13:13:50 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 7 Apr 1997 06:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Peter Trei" <trei@process.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 1997 06:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Anonymous Mailing Lists
Message-ID: <199704071313.GAA18158@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Toto wrote:
> > I'm not certain, being far from an expert on remailers and
> > majordomos. I've had one person indicate that majordomos could
> > be configured to keep all users anonymous, but didn't know
> > if it could be done selectively in the case of anonymous
> > remailers. He is supposed to get back to me on it.
A few years ago, I maintained a low-traffic mailing list in
which the users could be anonymous to each other - I was the
only person who knew the recipient list. I used perl scripts to
manage it, and manually edited messages which requested
anonymity (it was a digest-style list). A perl script
individually mailed copies to about 600 recipients.
It worked, but was not scalable to higher traffic volumes.
Peter Trei
trei@process.com
Return to April 1997
Return to ““Peter Trei” <trei@process.com>”
1997-04-07 (Mon, 7 Apr 1997 06:13:50 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Anonymous Mailing Lists - “Peter Trei” <trei@process.com>