1997-04-09 - Re: which remailers are safe?

Header Data

From: Alec <camcc@abraxis.com>
To: <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 5e9ecd00bcc8f314567a7f5c4c2cd8b326a124af4e1a17e964960d66cd9dd1a5
Message ID: <3.0.1.32.19970409123003.007c5480@smtp1.abraxis.com>
Reply To: <199704091457.KAA09412@main.inetnow.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-04-09 16:30:53 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 9 Apr 1997 09:30:53 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: Alec <camcc@abraxis.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 1997 09:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
To: <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: which remailers are safe?
In-Reply-To: <199704091457.KAA09412@main.inetnow.net>
Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19970409123003.007c5480@smtp1.abraxis.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 11:01 AM 4/9/97 -0500, 00043.an@edtec.com wrote:
|For some reason my anonymized posts here are never arriving?
|So I try this service - does anyone know about edtec.com?
|The problem is, does anyone really know who their remailer is?
|Which ones are known absolutely to be run by safe operators,
|and which ones are thought or known to be trolls by Unsavory Characters?
|I am very interested to see if this post makes it to the list!

Dear 00043.an,

I have a sense of being here before!

'Twas a post such as this that called forth TruthMngler.

Spare us!

Alec





Thread