From: Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 12:31:15 -0800 (PST)
To: "A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security" <PADGETT@hobbes.orl.mmc.com>
Subject: Re: Analysis of proposed UK ban on use of non-escrowed crypto
In-Reply-To: <970402101906.20605156@hobbes.orl.mmc.com>
Message-ID: <3342BDDE.5318@sk.sympatico.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security wrote:
> 
> Personally think these proposals are "fliers", things so bad that the
> radicals will get hung up on elements the gov could really care less about.
> Tricky part is to pick out what complies with the *real* agenda.

  Sounds like you got caught 'bending over' in the past, and learned
from the experience.
  How about a law that requires all politicians to speak through an
interpreter? Say, Howard Stern? (Only because Lenny Bruce is dead.)
-- 
Toto
"The Xenix Chainsaw Massacre"
http://bureau42.base.org/public/xenix/xenbody.html