1997-04-02 - Re: Analysis of proposed UK ban on use of non-escrowed crypto.

Header Data

From: nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ca82b6fbf139dd1476d249d179511ea4d391a69dfb302d11003a5af918aa9511
Message ID: <199704020022.QAA24113@fat.doobie.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-04-02 00:22:04 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 16:22:04 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 16:22:04 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Analysis of proposed UK ban on use of non-escrowed crypto.
Message-ID: <199704020022.QAA24113@fat.doobie.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Kent Crispin dribbled syphlyrically:
 
> Like it or not, businesses like -- no, *need* -- key escrow -- company
> secrets can't go down the drain because someone gets hit by a truck.

  An exact quote from some of your earlier posts.
  Are you working from a cheat-sheet?
  Is someone _telling_ you what to say?
  Are they holding your kids hostage and _making_ you say this?
  Is it time for Big Brother to hire some fresh writers?

TruthMonger






Thread