From: “Igor Chudov @ home” <ichudov@algebra.com>
To: news.groups@news.news.demon.net
Message Hash: f59fac1c468f9e223590903ce29858232d58525a76d817981fc40966754b46a3
Message ID: <199704170104.UAA11294@manifold.algebra.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-04-17 01:08:21 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 18:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Igor Chudov @ home" <ichudov@algebra.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 18:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
To: news.groups@news.news.demon.net
Subject: Re: 2nd RFD: sci.chem.organic.synthesis moderated
Message-ID: <199704170104.UAA11294@manifold.algebra.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Koen Van Aken (cheakv@panther.gsu.edu) wrote in <861165888.2842@isc.org>:
*
* At the end of each article, a full name and e-mail address is
* mandatory. Listing of position and association is optional but
* strongly encouraged.
... snip ...
* CHARTER: sci.chem.organic.synthesis
* This proposal is pro moderation to filter out unwanted (see not
* permitted postings) and 'anonymous' (see signature policy) messages.
* Although there are some disadvantages associated with moderated
* groups - some people compare it with censorship and it slows down
* the discussion - , sci.* groups have been plagued before with off-
* topic discussions which eventually turned users away.
I fail to see any reason why you need to filter out "anonymous" email.
I think that restricting anonymous email goes a long way against ability
to discuss important issues in general. I find it overly restrictive and
unwarranted.
Your explanation as to why you find it necessary to exclude anonymous
postings from your particular newsgroup will be much appreciated.
igor
Return to April 1997
Return to ““Igor Chudov @ home” <ichudov@algebra.com>”
1997-04-17 (Wed, 16 Apr 1997 18:08:21 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: 2nd RFD: sci.chem.organic.synthesis moderated - “Igor Chudov @ home” <ichudov@algebra.com>