1997-05-23 - Bcc’s & cpunks@algebra.com forwards

Header Data

From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
To: ichudov@algebra.com
Message Hash: 333e9b4c1a4522b5e81886c00cf184a21d3203057b5f9764a510cb06b801a333
Message ID: <199705230735.IAA00651@server.test.net>
Reply To: <199705230408.XAA32582@manifold.algebra.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-05-23 09:10:54 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 17:10:54 +0800

Raw message

From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 17:10:54 +0800
To: ichudov@algebra.com
Subject: Bcc's & cpunks@algebra.com forwards
In-Reply-To: <199705230408.XAA32582@manifold.algebra.com>
Message-ID: <199705230735.IAA00651@server.test.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Igor Chudov <ichudov@algebra.com> writes:
>
> plz do not use bcc

Why not?  It is quite convenient for coping with the non-cross posting
policy of other groups.

Also what is it with the <cpunks@manifold.algebra.com> forwards, why
are these coming to the list forwarded from that address?  Are they
things which failed your procmail filter manually forwarded
afterwards?

Adam

Thread

• Return to May 1997

• Return to “Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>”
• Return to “cpunks@algebra.com”

• Return to “ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)”

• 1997-05-23 (Fri, 23 May 1997 12:18:06 +0800) - RFC 2144 on CAST-128 Encryption Algorithms (fwd) - cpunks@algebra.com
  • 1997-05-23 (Fri, 23 May 1997 17:10:54 +0800) - Bcc’s & cpunks@algebra.com forwards - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-05-23 (Sat, 24 May 1997 07:14:27 +0800) - Re: Bcc’s & cpunks@algebra.com forwards - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
      • 1997-05-24 (Sat, 24 May 1997 17:02:20 +0800) - Re: Bcc’s & cpunks@algebra.com forwards - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
        • 1997-05-24 (Sat, 24 May 1997 20:10:14 +0800) - Re: Bcc’s & cpunks@algebra.com forwards - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)