From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 4f1691f85b0b5d557c6cf4c67d61829c52ab04d7936d3eb6bf924af5bcf52bb5
Message ID: <199705231444.QAA16307@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-05-23 14:58:54 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 22:58:54 +0800
From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 22:58:54 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Spam laws threaten remailers?
Message-ID: <199705231444.QAA16307@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Two possibilities:
First, the law might not apply to remailer operators. It only applies
to originators of messages. It might make it illegal to use remailers
to send commercial messages, but that would apply to the users,
not to the remailer operators.
Even if it does apply to remailers, they can comply with it.
Put "Advertisement" at the front of each subject line, and put the
remailer operator's contact info in the message. Remailer operators
are not generally hidden, so this does not hurt them any.
Return to May 1997
Return to “Tim May <tcmay@got.net>”