From: Jim Burnes <jim.burnes@ssds.com>
To: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 4fdd844c2197245169fc6ee94eb67ac29fecdb7a2130af22c269e08ee206d0bc
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970527122813.1144B-100000@westsec.denver.ssds.com>
Reply To: <3.0.32.19970524204444.00739384@netcom13.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-05-27 19:00:34 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 03:00:34 +0800
From: Jim Burnes <jim.burnes@ssds.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 03:00:34 +0800
To: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Beware of encrypted processors bearing gifts...
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970524204444.00739384@netcom13.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970527122813.1144B-100000@westsec.denver.ssds.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Sat, 24 May 1997, Lucky Green wrote:
> At 10:28 PM 5/24/97 -0400, Dave Emery wrote:
> > A three way encrypted handshake between an encrypted agent that
> >was part of the OS and a smart card and software at an ISP could be
> >used to enforce an internet drivers license law for example, with no
> >packets being forwarded by the ISP without hard authentication (even up
> >to biometrics) of the user. And it would be rather trivial to disallow
> >use of "unapproved" software to communicate over the net, making
> >enforcement of GAK much more complete. One could even use such a
> >mechanism to forbid use of any uncertified software on a net connected
> >machine, thus making it rather hard to use such rogue applications as
> >PGP.
>
> I strongly agree with you. While the motivation that lead to the
> development of such processors stems probably from the desire to thwart
> software piracy, it will make implementation of the "Internet Driver
> License" that much easier.
>
> [For those new to Cypherpunks, I consider the requirement for an Internet
> Driver License as inevitable as the sun raising tomorrow morning. While the
> event is technically in the future, it will occur with a certainty that it
> may just as well have already happened in the past. Read the graphic novel
> "Watchmen" if you don't understand what I am talking about. Sure, there is
> a small but no-zero probability that the Earth will be vaporized before
> sunrise by a timebomb left by aliens 3.5 million years ago. That's why I
> wrote "as inevitable", as opposed to "inevitable".]
>
Well...they will TRY...
If this kind of thing gets through without a huge fight from the
public in general and the crypto community specifically, then we
get exactly what we deserve.
I will be heading for some quiet island at that point.
All aboard for Vonuatu.
(though I hear its not that quiet these days) 8-)
Jim Burnes
Return to May 1997
Return to “Steve Schear <azur@netcom.com>”