1997-05-16 - Re: Spam IS Free Speech

Header Data

From: nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5643c0fe77b5b8f12a72437fc3e16577168dffd65861fd131b0795c60fad633c
Message ID: <199705160538.WAA25833@fat.doobie.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-05-16 05:59:16 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 13:59:16 +0800

Raw message

From: nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)
Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 13:59:16 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Spam IS Free Speech
Message-ID: <199705160538.WAA25833@fat.doobie.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Ross Wright wrote:
>  >   Gander. Goose.
> 
> Right.  If I send you a gig, you send me a gig.  If I send you a meg
> you send me a meg.  A few bytes for a few bytes.  Are you following
> what has upset me about this issue, yet?  Like for Like, Goose,
> Gander.  You said it, but you don't mean it.

  Pardon me.
  Gander. Humongous fucking goose.
 
> Right?  You are saying if I send you one message, you have the right
> to mail bomb me?  There's no parity there.

  All's fair in love and Penis War.
  Your argument seems to center around the theme that those who dick
everyone a little have no right to expect to be repaid in lump (pardon
the pun) sum.

  You neglect to point out that those who use technology to send spam
to millions of random addresses go to great pains to prevent those who
receive their crapola from replying to the source of the spam.
  The fact is, anyone who chooses to return their crap in kind has my
personal proxy to send them my share, as well. I am certain that if you
take a poll on this you will find a few million others who will also
give them this proxy.

Penis Warrior







Thread