From: tzeruch@ceddec.com
Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 01:39:29 +0800
To: cypherpunks@algebra.com
Subject: Re: Compelling a key (fwd)
Message-ID: <97May22.131535edt.32257-1@brickwall.ceddec.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Why does everyone still have cypherpunks@toad.com in their Cc: list, or
how can I get it to work so I don't have to edit the headers (back to the
procmail manual...)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 22 May 1997 13:17:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: tzeruch@ceddec.com
To: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Cc: Jim Choate <ravage@EINSTEIN.ssz.com>, cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Compelling a key (fwd)

On Wed, 21 May 1997, Tim May wrote:

> At 4:45 PM -0800 5/21/97, Jim Choate wrote:
> 
> >> In practice, I think the Washington, D.C. doctor, Elizabeth X, the woman
> >> who refused to say where her children were, was held for about 2 years, and
> >> that this was the all-time record for a contempt case. She was ultimately
> >> released when the court concluded she had no intention of cooperating.
> >
> >Exactly! It is ENTIRELY up to the individual judge who issued the contempt
> >citation. If they are pissed enough 2 years will be nothing. As far as I
> >have been able to find there are NO statutes, other than that of a statute
> >of limitation for a particular type of crime, that limit how long you can
> >sit in jail on contempt.

One correction.  She was released by a special law passed by the house of
representatives after a media blitz about her case.  The law only let her
go and did not generally limit the period of time people could be held in
contempt.  It was not the judge, but a legislature trying to quell some
outcry without doing any real reform