1997-05-22 - Re: Hey, what does this mean?

Header Data

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
To: Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
Message Hash: 5ea99f7ef88d604812c1ed9b82c79f6253cf0649743e45fa020bbee59d6920b3
Message ID: <3.0.1.32.19970522012455.00745ae8@popd.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970521163045.13177M-100000@ece>
UTC Datetime: 1997-05-22 08:43:37 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 22 May 1997 16:43:37 +0800

Raw message

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 1997 16:43:37 +0800
To: Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
Subject: Re: Hey, what does this mean?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970521163045.13177M-100000@ece>
Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19970522012455.00745ae8@popd.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 08:45 PM 5/21/97 -0400, Rabid Wombat wrote:
>Didn't a member of congress describe, in session, in detail, how to make a
>bomb, quoting instructions found on the Internet? Wouldn't this make
>possesion of the Congressional Record a felony? Anybody able to cite this
>reference? 

>On Wed, 21 May 1997, Ryan Anderson wrote:
>> Felony count of possession of bomb-making instructions?  *INSTRUCTIONS*?

Step back a sec, folks, Tim's article _was_ satire... (at least for now.)

On the other hand, a number of Senators have emailed me about the CDA and
instructions for making bombs and blowing up government buildings
(Amazing what you can get an auto-responder to do! :-)  Some of them
truncated their replies to 80 characters, and the House's email responder
was far more boring.  

Remember - November 5th, barrels of gunpowder in the basement,
and don't get caught this time!


#			Thanks;  Bill
# Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts@ix.netcom.com
# You can get PGP outside the US at ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto/pgp
#   (If this is a mailing list or news, please Cc: me on replies.  Thanks.)






Thread