1997-05-10 - Re: Stego Cash?

Header Data

From: frissell@panix.com
To: Tim May <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 848f63acea969aae057cafadd656ed33e2fd3f34480d7643df9abcacd5e05f99
Message ID: <3.0.1.32.19970510124931.0075af90@panix.com>
Reply To: <199705082338.TAA24157@rho.pair.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-05-10 17:04:51 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 11 May 1997 01:04:51 +0800

Raw message

From: frissell@panix.com
Date: Sun, 11 May 1997 01:04:51 +0800
To: Tim May <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Stego Cash?
In-Reply-To: <199705082338.TAA24157@rho.pair.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19970510124931.0075af90@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 07:42 PM 5/8/97 -0800, Tim May wrote:
>At 3:38 PM -0800 5/8/97, kqb@planet.net wrote:
>>What does it take to set up an offshore "remailer bank"?  Of course,
>>the digital cash it uses must be very INefficient, chock full of bit
>>bloat that hosts plenty of not-so-subliminal channels. 8-)
>
>You hit the nail on the head with your last line: subliminal channels.
>
>Even financial software, ostensibly with no export controls, will still
>have to be vetted for export, as any system usable for financial
>cryptography is almost certainly usable for "other purposes."

My old line courtesy of a DYAM (Dead Yellow Asian Male):

"Revolutionaries swim like fish in the sea of commerce."

DCF






Thread