From: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@amaranth.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 1997 11:02:32 +0800
To: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
Subject: Re: Banking Secrecy and Nazi Gold
In-Reply-To: <199705080050.TAA00821@manifold.algebra.com>
Message-ID: <199705080238.VAA09065@mailhub.amaranth.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


In <199705080050.TAA00821@manifold.algebra.com>, on 05/07/97 at 06:50 PM,
   ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home) said:


>Tim May wrote:
>> I try to deconstruct events, to determine what the real issues are.
>> 
>> Take the case of the ongoing flap over Switzerland and claims that Swiss
>> banks hid gold, jewels, and other forms of money for high-ranking Nazis.
>> Adding to the flap--actually, making it a newsworthy event--is the
>> allegation, probably true, that some of the gold was taken from Jews and
>> others sent to extermination camps.

>... snip ...

>> OK, so it's clear to all right-thinking persons what should be done:
>> Switzerland should return the money to the heirs of those killed by the
>> Nazis.
>> 
>> Ah, but it's not so clear to me. I guess I'm not a right-thinking person.

>According to americal common law, as I understand it, no one can get a
>valid title to the property from someone who did not have such title.

>E.g., if you steal Vulis's car and then sell it to me, I will not have the
>title to the car and will have to return it back to Vulis (and may be able
>to try to recover my loss from you). The same will be true if you lend the
>stolen car to me -- he can get it back if he proves that it is his.

>I find that reasoning to be quite good.

>Lending stolen money (or stolen golden teeth) to banks is no different
>than lending stolen cars.

>American law does not have to apply to Switzerland, but I find that 
>particular part of it to be just. The issue, of course, is coming up with
>the proof.

>I will appreciate if someone could correct me.

It is an intresting approach to justify current action agains the Swiss
Banks. If you could prove that the Swiss received stolen property what
about the "statute of limitations"? Most US crimes require that they be
prosecuted within x # of years ( I think that theft is 7yrs. ). Considering
that this all happened over 50yrs and AFAIK no capital crimes have been
commited by the swiss banks even if they are "guilty" of receiving stolen
property I can hardly see how they can be held accountable now.

- -- 
- -----------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III  http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting    Cooking With Warp 4.0

Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
                          
Finger whgiii@amaranth.com for PGP Key and other info
- -----------------------------------------------------------
 
Tag-O-Matic: Windows: The CP/M of the future!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Registered User E-Secure v1.1 ES000000

iQCUAwUBM3FLyI9Co1n+aLhhAQE1awP4hhvMhABdx45sR/jpCfLdw2vWP7rIWaH8
tYApUlYMbcio/p43HGPwPBiwhT4V+5gcaskAkRZKxmtEg4BGmA9H4DKUURCtFjS7
GeI+/B+LNPEQHcCdvaGpl/ujnsN/WU/ASj/6cvG04ifkcggDYtMJ6UM+Kki9Gysj
EaC1sZWXRA==
=ztPr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----