1997-05-17 - Lucky’s explaination…

Header Data

From: nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 8999229dfd5cb911282bc080f453e83925f156ca9a090a767d69f2ae1622b29b
Message ID: <199705170629.XAA22759@fat.doobie.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-05-17 06:56:46 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 17 May 1997 14:56:46 +0800

Raw message

From: nobody@huge.cajones.com (Huge Cajones Remailer)
Date: Sat, 17 May 1997 14:56:46 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Lucky's explaination...
Message-ID: <199705170629.XAA22759@fat.doobie.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Lucky Green wrote:
> At 11:39 PM 5/15/97 CST, TruthMonger wrote:
> >Tim May wrote:
> >> Further, a clever little fix is to make one's own remailer site a link in
> >> the chain. All a snooping subset of remailers can do is trace the message
> >> back to your own remailers. Obviously, they can't know if the message was
> >> merely _remailed_ through your site, or _originated_ there. Thus, including
> >> oneself as a remailer also provides excellent plausible deniability.)

> >  This is a lame idea with no merit whatsoever.
 
> Since Tim's statement describes today's standard practice for increasing
> security for one's remailed messages, perhaps TruthMonger would like to
> explain why it has no merit. But then again, TruthMonger = Infowar. Guess
> we won't see an explanation that has merit.

  If you had read the header of the message, then you would have seen
the explaination.

TruthMonger






Thread