From: “Jack Flap” <jack_flap@hotmail.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 8a7c58c55f9cadc1aa3f0c713234ddf77a74597ff8995bc1dd2e026ac3902214
Message ID: <199705291406.HAA02256@f19.hotmail.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-05-29 14:21:45 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 22:21:45 +0800
From: "Jack Flap" <jack_flap@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 22:21:45 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: 1996 Wiretap Report
Message-ID: <199705291406.HAA02256@f19.hotmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Eric Blossom <eb@comsec.com> may have written:
> (2) In the past 11 years (1986 - 1996) a total of 9,912 intercept
> applications were approved. Of that number 5 (five!) were for
> "Arson, explosives, and weapons." Unless they've classified wiretaps
> against "suspected terrorists" in the "Other" category, it looks
> as if the LEOs don't think (targeted) wiretaps are useful for stopping
> small groups of modestly skilled people bent on blowing things up. No
Shit.
Hmmm. :-)
I guess the spook angle is to ensure that those are <cringe>well
targetted</cringe> wiretaps - targetting based on intelligence,
which is probably not the same as legal intercept...
Jack.
---------------------------------------------------------
Get Your *Web-Based* Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
---------------------------------------------------------
Return to May 1997
Return to ““Jack Flap” <jack_flap@hotmail.com>”
1997-05-29 (Thu, 29 May 1997 22:21:45 +0800) - Re: 1996 Wiretap Report - “Jack Flap” <jack_flap@hotmail.com>