1997-05-01 - Re: SAFE Bill is a Disaster–“Use a cipher, go to prison”

Header Data

From: jimbell@pacifier.com (Jim Bell)
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: bd6d6780fe52b8d65dca008f7b583b4f1cf48a1f6d6ecfa1c9448909e1fa8d94
Message ID: <199705010328.UAA19133@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-05-01 03:40:58 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 11:40:58 +0800

Raw message

From: jimbell@pacifier.com (Jim Bell)
Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 11:40:58 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: SAFE Bill is a Disaster--"Use a cipher, go to prison"
Message-ID: <199705010328.UAA19133@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 17:19 4/30/97 -0800, Tim May wrote:
>(A copy of this message has also been posted to the following newsgroups:
>alt.cypherpunks,  talk.politics.crypto, comp.org.eff.talk)
>CDT and other Washington insider groups are busily singing the praises of
>the SAFE encryption bill, despite some acknowledged "minor flaws."
>
>Well, the flaws are not minor. The bill does not give Americans any rights
>they do not already have, and does not ease export of strong crypto in any
>meaningful way. In fact, the bill contains odd language implying it is
>essentially only financial software which is easier to export, and then
>only if the receiving country (huh?) allows it...since when is the duty of
>U.S. Customs to pass products for export based on whether Baluchistan, for
>example, wants the product?

I agree with everything you've said, here.  SAFE is truly awful if it
attempts to make use of encryption illegal.  Prosecuting the underlying
crime, if a crime was done, should be considered more than enough.

The thugs are afraid of getting whacked.


Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com






Thread