From: frissell@panix.com
Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 19:26:41 +0800
To: Blanc <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: War & InfoWar
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970510224212.006e0a84@cnw.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19970512065607.0294f20c@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 10:43 PM 5/10/97 -0700, Blanc wrote:
>TruthMonger wrote:
>
>>  Of course, you have your own definintion of innocenent bystanders,
>>while others may have different definitions.
>..........................................................
>
>To me, an innocent bystander would be someone who was walking by a building
>which was blown up by someone with a grudge against its occupants.
>
>You lose the point of your attack when you kill those who do not relate to
>the reason for your attack.
>
>"To save the village, we had to destroy it."
>
>
>    ..
>Blanc
>

But Blanc,what if "It Takes A Village to Raise a Child" and the village is trying to raise my child against my will.  In that case, the only way to handle things is to destroy the village.  Not to save it,but to save my child.

Think about it.

But not for too long.

DCF